King's RepositoryのロゴKing's Repository

Philidor Defence

Chess Opening Theory/1. e4/1...e5/2. Nf3/2...d6

Philidor defence
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h

Position in Forsyth-Edwards Notation (FEN)
Moves: 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 d6
Parent: King's knight opening

2...d6 · Philidor defence

[edit | edit source]

Black defends their e5 pawn with 2...d6, sparing a piece from being saddled with the job.

Though solid, this is considered a more passive reply than 2...Nc6, as Black does not develop a piece and Black's pawn chain will get in the way of developing their dark square bishop.

3. d4 is the main line, threatening to immediately crack open the centre with dxe5. White imagines a continuation like 3...Bg4?! 4. dxe5 dxe5? 5. Qxd8+ Kxd8 6. Nxe5 Be6 +- (White is up materiel and controls the centre, while Black has lost castling rights).

After 3. d4, Black's best approaches are to give up their centre and open the game with 3...exd4, the Exchange variation, or to hold on to e5 and keep the tension with 3...Nd7, the Hanham variation. Black's most Romantic reply is 3...f5?!, the Philidor countergambit.

3. Bc4 is an alternative for White. White may just follow with d4 anyway and transpose, or they may wish to play less confrontationally with d3, ensuring their bishop isn't hemmed in by their pawn chain first.

3. Nc3 is another alternative, followed by either Be2, intending to castle short, or Bf4 and Qd2 to castle long.

History

[edit | edit source]

2...d6 was recommended as an alternative to defending the pawn with 2...Nc6 by 16th century chess theoretician Ruy López de Segura, in order to avoid the reply 3. Bb5 (i.e. the Spanish opening) which he believed favoured White.

It is named for François-André Danican Philidor, the 18th century chess master, who advocated 2...d6 with the continuation 3. d4 f5?!, the Philidor countergambit, to assault White's centre.[1] Philidor disliked moves like 2...Nc6 for impeding the advance the c- or f-pawns that he thought was more critical, advising:

Il faut se garder de le jouer a la troisième case de fon fou, avant que le pion de ce fon, tait ete poussè deux pas, parce qu'autrement le cavalier empecherait sa marche.
[Great care must be taken not to play the Knight to his Bishop's third square, before the Bishop's Pawn has been pushed two steps because, otherwise, the Knight would prove an hindrance to the motion of the Pawn.]
—Philidor[2]:3 [contemporary translation][3]:3

In 1858 it was employed unsuccessfully by the Duke of Brunswick and Comte Isougard in their game against Paul Morphy. The Opera Game, as it is called, is widely used as an illustrative game in chess pedagogy today.[4]

Its popularity declined in the 20th century and it is no longer seen at the top levels of chess.

Theory table

[edit | edit source]

For explanation of theory tables, see theory table and for notation, see algebraic notation..

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 d6

3 4 5
1 d4
exd4
Nxd4
Nf6
Nc3
Be7
=
2 Bc4
Be7
d3
Nf6
c3
O-O
=

When contributing to this Wikibook, please follow the Conventions for organization.

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. ChessBase (2016). Philidor's "L'Analyze des Echecs".
  2. Philidor, F. D. (1777). Analyse du jeu des échecs; nouvelle édition, considérablement augmentée (in French) (2nd ed.). London.
  3. Philidor, F. D. (1790). Analysis of the game of chess. Vol. 1. London: P Elmsley.
  4. Chessgames.com (2023). Paul Morphy vs Duke Karl / Count Isouard.

Bibliography

[edit | edit source]


v · t · e
Chess Opening Theory
1. e4 e5
Open game
2. Nf3
With 2...Nc6:
  • Four knights ( )
  • Italian game ( )
  • Spanish game ( )

With other 2nd moves:

2. Other
1. e4 c5
Sicilian defence
1. e4 ...other: