Chess Opening Theory/1. e4/1...e5/2. Nf3/2...Nc6/3. Bb5/3...Nf6/4. d3
Anti-Berlin | |
---|---|
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
|
|
Position in Forsyth-Edwards Notation (FEN)
|
|
Moves: 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. d3 | |
ECO code: C65-C68 | |
Parent: Berlin defence |
4. d3 · Anti-Berlin
[edit | edit source]4. d3 defends White's e4 pawn. This avoids the mainline of the Berlin defence, 4. O-O, where White temporarily sacrifices the e4 pawn.
Now that White's e4 pawn is protected, this increases the threat to Black's e5 pawn. If for example 4...a6?, White can trade off the defending knight and win the pawn (5. Bxc6 dxc6 6. Nxe5), and Black's usual 6...Qd4? tactic no longer forks anything.
Defend the pawn
[edit | edit source]Black can choose to defend the pawn directly or tactically:
4...d6, to defend the e5 pawn directly, is playable but relegates the kingside bishop to a supporting role on e7.
4...Bc5 is the mainline. This pressures White's f2 pawn and sets up a new tactical riposte: now if White trades off the knight and takes the pawn (5. Bxc6 dxc6 6. Nxe5), then 6...Qd4! forks the knight with the threat of Qxf2#. White's usual response is 5. c3, controlling the d4 square and so preventing Qd4.
Gambit the pawn
[edit | edit source]4...Ne7, the Mortimer variation, is a sideline. This gambits the e5 pawn, but if White takes it, they fall into the devious Mortimer trap: 5. Nxe5 c6 6. Bc4 Qa5+!, forking the knight with check.
Theory table
[edit | edit source]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. d3
4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anti-Berlin | ... Bc5 |
c3 O-O |
O-O d6 |
Nbd2 a6 |
Ba4 Ba7 |
h3 h6 |
= |
(transposes) | ... ... |
O-O d6 |
c3 O-O |
||||
... ... |
Bxc6 dxc6 |
Nxe5?? Qd4 |
Be3 Qxe5 |
∓ | |||
... d6 |
h3 Be7 |
O-O O-O |
c3 a6 |
Ba4 b5 |
Bc2 Bb7 |
⩲ | |
... a6? |
Bxc6 dxc6 |
Nxe5 Bd6 |
Nf3 | ± |
References
[edit | edit source]See also
[edit | edit source]
With 2...g6:
With other 2nd moves for Black:
Dutch defence